×

Lawyers in international civil litigation handle legal disputes that cross national borders, involving individuals, businesses, or governments. Their primary role is to navigate complex legal frameworks, reconcile differences in laws across jurisdictions, and ensure their clients' interests are protected in international courts or arbitration forums.
Clients:

  • Corporations involved in cross-border disputes.
  • Individuals seeking redress for transnational wrongs (e.g., torts, contract breaches).
  • States or state-owned entities engaged in disputes with foreign parties.
  • Multinational Corporations: Disputes related to contracts, investments, or intellectual property.
  • Governments: Legal counsel in disputes involving treaties or sovereignty issues.
  • Small Businesses and Startups: Cross-border contract enforcement or intellectual property protection.
  • Individuals: Cases involving family law (e.g., international custody disputes), inheritance, or personal injury across borders.


Legal Instruments:

  • Hague Service Convention: Ensures service of process in foreign jurisdictions.
  • Hague Evidence Convention: Facilitates cross-border collection of evidence.
  • New York Convention: Governs enforcement of international arbitral awards.
  • Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA): Provides rules for suing foreign states in domestic courts.
  • UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: Framework for resolving disputes through arbitration.


How We Assist Clients:

  • Filing or defending lawsuits involving foreign parties in domestic courts.
  • Enforcing or challenging foreign judgments and arbitral awards.
  • Managing jurisdictional issues and forum non conveniens challenges.
  • Conducting discovery across jurisdictions using international cooperation mechanisms.
  • Advising clients on litigation risk assessment in cross-border transactions.

Frequently Asked Questions

International civil litigation refers to legal disputes involving parties, events, or transactions that cross national borders. It encompasses cases like contract disputes, tort claims, intellectual property disputes, and enforcement of foreign judgments.

Contract disputes between multinational companies. Enforcement of foreign judgments or arbitral awards. Cross-border tort claims (e.g., personal injury or defamation). Disputes over intellectual property rights. Cases involving jurisdictional conflicts or forum shopping.
Determining which court has jurisdiction. Navigating conflicts of law between different legal systems. Enforcing judgments or awards in foreign jurisdictions. Conducting discovery across international borders. Addressing language, cultural, and procedural differences.
Filing or defending lawsuits in appropriate jurisdictions. Resolving jurisdictional disputes and forum non conveniens claims. Conducting cross-border discovery using international mechanisms. Advising on applicable laws and treaty obligations. Enforcing or challenging foreign judgments or arbitral awards.

Jurisdiction is usually determined based on factors like: The location of the parties. Where the contract was signed or performed. Where the harm occurred in tort cases. Forum selection clauses in contracts.

Foreign judgments are enforced through treaties, bilateral agreements, or local laws, depending on the countries involved. The judgment must meet legal requirements like proper jurisdiction and adherence to due process in the original proceeding.

Forum non conveniens is a legal doctrine that allows courts to dismiss a case if another jurisdiction is more appropriate for hearing the dispute. Courts consider factors like convenience, the location of evidence, and the interest of justice.

Treaties like the Hague Convention on Service of Process and the New York Convention on Arbitral Awards facilitate processes such as serving legal documents, conducting discovery, and enforcing judgments or awards across borders.

Discovery in international litigation is conducted using mechanisms like the Hague Evidence Convention or letters rogatory, allowing parties to collect evidence across jurisdictions while complying with local laws.

Yes, arbitration is a common alternative. It provides a neutral forum, faster resolution, and enforceable awards under treaties like the New York Convention.

Clients include multinational corporations, small businesses, government entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and individuals involved in cross-border disputes.

Businesses can reduce risks by: Including clear dispute resolution clauses in contracts. Conducting due diligence on applicable laws and jurisdictions. Seeking legal advice on risk assessment in cross-border transactions.

These clauses define the governing law and the forum where disputes will be resolved, providing clarity and predictability in case of legal disputes.

Seek lawyers or law firms with expertise in cross-border disputes, knowledge of international treaties, and experience in the jurisdictions involved.

The process typically involves filing or defending claims, jurisdictional challenges, discovery, trial or arbitration, and enforcement of judgments. Each stage requires careful legal strategy and compliance with local and international laws.

Related Video

Contact Us

We value your inquiries and feedback. Please feel free to reach out to us through any of the channels bellow: Our team is committed to responding promptly to your questions or concerns. Whether you seek assistance, wish to collaborate, or need more information about our work, we're here to help. You can also follow us on social media for updates on our latest initiatives and advocacy efforts.

  • +1.202.972.50.30
  • advocacy@orpe.org
  • 1802 Vernon Street, NW, Washington DC, 20009, United States

Quick Contact

Subscribe Us

Stay connected and informed! By subscribing to Orpe Advocates, you'll receive the latest updates, news, and insights on our ongoing efforts to defend justice, promote human dignity, and empower communities. Be part of our mission for change. Subscribe today and never miss an important update!